Virtual Asset Service Provider

 

 

FATF's Definition and Its Scope

 

The Financial Action Task Force defines a Virtual Asset Service Provider as any natural or legal person who is not covered elsewhere under the FATF Recommendations and as a business conducts one or more of the following activities or operations for or on behalf of another natural or legal person: exchange between virtual assets and fiat currencies; exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets; transfer of virtual assets; safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets; and participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer's offer and/or sale of a virtual asset.

The 'for or on behalf of another person' qualifier is critical: FATF's VASP definition targets service providers that conduct these activities on behalf of customers, not individuals managing their own personal crypto holdings. A person who buys Bitcoin for their own portfolio is not a VASP. A company that buys Bitcoin on behalf of customers, exchanges it, or holds it in custody for customers is a VASP. This distinction matters for crypto payment gateways: because they accept crypto from customers and transmit it (or its fiat equivalent) to merchants, they clearly fall within the VASP definition.

 

Which Businesses Are VASPs — and Which Are Not

 

Business Type

VASP?

Reasoning

Crypto payment gateway

Yes

Exchanges crypto for fiat on behalf of merchants; transfers virtual assets

Crypto exchange

Yes

Exchanges between VAs and fiat; exchanges between VAs

Crypto custodian

Yes

Safekeeping and administration of virtual assets

NFT marketplace (primary sales)

Sometimes

If facilitating financial transfers between buyers/sellers for investment purposes

DeFi protocol (non-custodial)

Debated

FATF guidance suggests some DeFi may be VASP; national implementation varies

Crypto wallet software provider

Generally no

Software provision without controlling funds; user holds keys

Individual crypto investor

No

Conducting activity for own account, not on behalf of others

Mining pool

Generally no

Technical service; not transferring VA on behalf of others

 

VASP Obligations Under FATF Recommendations

 

Countries that have implemented FATF's VASP standards — the majority of FATF member states — impose AML/CFT obligations on VASPs equivalent to those applied to traditional financial institutions. Core VASP obligations include: registering with or obtaining a license from a national competent authority; implementing a risk-based AML/CFT program; conducting customer due diligence; maintaining transaction records for at least five years; filing suspicious transaction reports with the national financial intelligence unit; and complying with the Travel Rule for VA transfers between VASPs above the applicable threshold.

The Travel Rule's application to VASPs created the most significant new compliance burden: VASPs must now identify counterparty VASPs in every qualifying transfer and exchange originator and beneficiary information before or alongside the transfer. This requires VASPs to build or access Travel Rule messaging infrastructure — TRISA, TRP, or commercial alternatives — that simply did not exist in the traditional financial system and required purpose-built development.

 

VASP Registration Across Key Jurisdictions

 

The global VASP regulatory landscape is fragmented: each jurisdiction has implemented FATF's VASP standards differently in terms of registration requirements, licensing thresholds, and ongoing obligations. The practical implication for a crypto payment gateway serving international merchants is that compliance requirements may differ significantly between the gateway's home jurisdiction and each country where merchants operate.

 

Jurisdiction

Regulatory Framework

Registration Body

Crypto-Specific Notes

EU (post-MiCA)

CASP authorization under MiCA

National competent authority

Full licensing; passporting available

US

MSB registration + state MTLs

FinCEN + state regulators

No federal crypto license; patchwork of state licenses

UK

Cryptoasset registration

FCA

Post-Brexit separate regime; strict FCA standards

Singapore

Major/Standard Payment Institution

MAS

PSA framework; clear and predictable

UAE (ADGM/DIFC)

Virtual Asset Framework

FSRA/DFSA

Active fintech hub; structured licensing

El Salvador

Bitcoin Law compliance

BCR

Bitcoin legal tender; unique global position

 

 

Compliance Note: This glossary entry is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Industry terminology may vary across jurisdictions and providers; definitions herein may not directly reflect the specific features, terms, or specifications of Finassets' services. For details on Finassets' offerings, please refer to official product documentation or contact our team directly.